WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:00.895
Hi.

00:00:00.895 --> 00:00:04.071
It’s no secret that I love heat pumps.

00:00:04.071 --> 00:00:07.875
Making a substance liquify in one place and vaporize in another

00:00:07.875 --> 00:00:12.745
on our command to move&nbsp;heat feels like a physics cheat code.

00:00:12.745 --> 00:00:16.769
We’ve been doing it for a very long time in refrigerators&nbsp;
and air conditioners,

00:00:16.769 --> 00:00:21.985
and we’re finally starting to collectively realize the benefits of doing it&nbsp;backwards.

00:00:21.985 --> 00:00:25.878
And, thanks to the very unfortunate global happenings,

00:00:25.878 --> 00:00:31.458
the need to reduce our&nbsp;dependence on fossil fuels has found new and different urgency.

00:00:31.458 --> 00:00:37.159
The world seems increasingly&nbsp;
in agreement that it’s time for more pumping more now.

00:00:37.159 --> 00:00:40.081
And the world is absolutely right about&nbsp;that!

00:00:40.081 --> 00:00:42.395
In this video, I’d like to explain why.

00:00:42.960 --> 00:00:46.897
Real quick, you may have realized that I have&nbsp;
already made a video—

00:00:46.897 --> 00:00:48.671
as a matter of fact two

00:00:48.671 --> 00:00:50.963
—on the subject of heat pumps.

00:00:50.963 --> 00:00:53.478
So what’s this one for?

00:00:53.478 --> 00:00:58.330
Well, heat pumps are at the top of a lot of folks’ minds right now but also, you see,

00:00:58.330 --> 00:00:59.940
that second&nbsp;video?

00:00:59.940 --> 00:01:01.447
I’m not really happy with it.

00:01:01.447 --> 00:01:08.865
Largely because I ignored the developments that are happening and&nbsp;indeed have already happened in the air-source heat pump space,

00:01:08.865 --> 00:01:15.280
and I touted the much, MUCH harder&nbsp;
to build ground-source heat pump as “the future.”

00:01:16.160 --> 00:01:19.254
Now, to be clear, if you are in a very cold&nbsp;
place

00:01:19.254 --> 00:01:23.147
and have the ability to invest in a geothermal heat pump system,

00:01:23.147 --> 00:01:25.110
I still think you&nbsp;should consider it.

00:01:25.110 --> 00:01:27.494
And by the way if you want to know what that is,

00:01:27.494 --> 00:01:29.006
well check out the link&nbsp;below.

00:01:29.006 --> 00:01:32.611
But even in pretty cold climates like mine,

00:01:32.611 --> 00:01:36.109
effective air-source heat pumps are available&nbsp;
today

00:01:36.109 --> 00:01:42.409
which will reduce the total amount of fuel required to heat your home over a&nbsp;year — even with today’s electric grid.

00:01:42.960 --> 00:01:45.520
That’s good from an emissions standpoint, yes,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:45.520 --> 00:01:51.600
but it also means more simply that we need&nbsp;
less fuel for heating our living spaces.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:51.600 --> 00:01:57.472
And that means we don’t need to obtain as much&nbsp;
of it from places we may not want to.

00:01:57.472 --> 00:02:00.423
Simply put, in a world where heat pumps exist

00:02:00.423 --> 00:02:02.882
— which is this&nbsp;one right now! —

00:02:02.882 --> 00:02:09.022
it actually makes more sense to burn natural gas in a power plant to generate&nbsp;electricity

00:02:09.022 --> 00:02:15.046
than it does to pipe that gas into homes and businesses to be burned on-site for heat.

00:02:15.046 --> 00:02:17.061
I know,&nbsp;pretty wild, right?

00:02:17.061 --> 00:02:18.979
Let’s talk about why that is.

00:02:19.600 --> 00:02:22.057
Since this more of a heat pump update,

00:02:22.057 --> 00:02:23.656
or heat&nbsp;pumpdate,

00:02:23.656 --> 00:02:26.743
I’m not going to go into how heat pumps actually work -

00:02:26.743 --> 00:02:29.964
check out the original video if&nbsp;you’d like to understand that.

00:02:29.964 --> 00:02:32.560
It is pretty cool, and pretty hot.

00:02:32.560 --> 00:02:36.260
But I will go over the COP again&nbsp;
because it’s what really matters -

00:02:36.260 --> 00:02:38.568
and why they’re so important.

00:02:38.568 --> 00:02:44.896
The coefficient of performance is&nbsp;
a number that expresses how much heat energy a heating device produces

00:02:44.896 --> 00:02:48.969
compared to how much&nbsp;
electrical energy it consumes in the process.

00:02:49.440 --> 00:02:51.110
Resistive electric heat —

00:02:51.110 --> 00:02:55.559
the ordinary&nbsp;kind you find in toasters, space heaters, hair dryers, and whatnot

00:02:55.559 --> 00:02:57.639
— has a COP of 1.

00:02:57.639 --> 00:03:03.647
That means every 1 kilowatt of power consumed becomes 1 kilowatt of heat output.

00:03:03.647 --> 00:03:07.760
Turning&nbsp;electrical energy into heat is 100% efficient,

00:03:07.760 --> 00:03:13.746
so every single watt of power that this heater&nbsp;
is consuming is ending up in the room as heat.

00:03:14.240 --> 00:03:19.861
That’s not bad, but a wrinkle there is&nbsp;
that electricity *generation* is A)

00:03:19.861 --> 00:03:22.709
not 100% efficient and B)

00:03:22.709 --> 00:03:24.179
somewhat scarce.

00:03:24.179 --> 00:03:30.311
Let’s start&nbsp;with efficiency - a modern power plant that burns natural gas is, after transmission losses,

00:03:30.311 --> 00:03:32.338
about&nbsp;40% efficient.

00:03:32.338 --> 00:03:38.822
Note that I’m deliberately talking only about natural gas plants - you’ll understand&nbsp;why as we go on.

00:03:38.822 --> 00:03:41.903
If you burn natural gas at a rate of 10 megawatts,

00:03:41.903 --> 00:03:45.794
a power plant will only produce&nbsp;
4 megawatts of electricity from it.

00:03:45.794 --> 00:03:50.872
While that would get turned into about 4 megawatts of heat if&nbsp;
it was run through a few thousand space heaters,

00:03:50.872 --> 00:03:56.946
we could turn that into more than 9 megawatts&nbsp;
of heat if we piped that gas into buildings

00:03:56.946 --> 00:04:00.179
and burned it locally in boilers or furnaces.

00:04:00.179 --> 00:04:02.659
As I explored in my video on furnaces,

00:04:02.659 --> 00:04:08.395
we know how to get nearly all of a fuel’s heat&nbsp;
energy out of it in a safe, effective fashion.

00:04:08.395 --> 00:04:12.287
So… in many parts of the world that’s exactly&nbsp;
what we do.

00:04:12.287 --> 00:04:15.488
Burning fuel on-site has been until pretty recently

00:04:15.488 --> 00:04:20.122
the most rational way to use&nbsp;that resource for the purpose of space heating.

00:04:20.621 --> 00:04:23.491
The other problem with electric heat&nbsp;a la toasters

00:04:23.491 --> 00:04:27.435
is that there is only so much grid capacity to go around.

00:04:27.435 --> 00:04:30.599
It takes a lot of energy to heat a building -

00:04:30.599 --> 00:04:34.593
heating buildings is among&nbsp;
the most energy-intensive things we do.

00:04:35.040 --> 00:04:41.600
And in many areas the electric grid just isn’t big enough&nbsp;
to switch everyone over to simple electric heat.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:41.600 --> 00:04:45.727
And it’s not because we couldn’t build it to&nbsp;do so, to be clear.

00:04:45.727 --> 00:04:53.045
It’s just that, except in areas with access to abundant and stable renewable&nbsp;energy like hydroelectric power,

00:04:53.045 --> 00:04:58.148
it has traditionally been much more expensive and resource intensive to&nbsp;heat with electricity

00:04:58.148 --> 00:05:02.290
because of the efficiency challenges in fossil-fuel power plants.

00:05:02.290 --> 00:05:05.615
The&nbsp;electric infrastructure in areas like where I live

00:05:05.615 --> 00:05:12.186
just isn't expected to produce as much much energy in winter months 
because electricity demand has historically fallen

00:05:12.186 --> 00:05:15.793
when air&nbsp;conditioners stop running and furnaces fire up.

00:05:16.320 --> 00:05:22.762
But, thanks to heat pumps, we can largely sidestep&nbsp;
both of those challenges altogether.

00:05:22.762 --> 00:05:25.541
When it comes to the need for electricity generation,

00:05:25.541 --> 00:05:29.412
since&nbsp;heat pumps aren’t converting electrical energy into heat

00:05:29.412 --> 00:05:35.386
but are instead using it to drive a&nbsp;
refrigeration circuit which moves heat indoors,

00:05:35.386 --> 00:05:39.036
they have coefficients of performance&nbsp;that are greater than 1.

00:05:39.036 --> 00:05:45.280
Simply put, they produce more useful heat with the same&nbsp;
electricity than a simple electric heater does.

00:05:45.840 --> 00:05:49.467
Sometimes, more than 5 times as much.

00:05:49.467 --> 00:05:53.769
This means&nbsp;that although heat pumps will put more demand on the electric grid

00:05:53.769 --> 00:05:56.900
in places that currently use gas&nbsp;for heating,

00:05:56.900 --> 00:06:00.422
they require a fraction of the energy of resistive heat

00:06:00.422 --> 00:06:04.988
and so make electrification&nbsp;much more feasible in those parts of the world.

00:06:05.440 --> 00:06:09.481
That’s definitely good, but here’s where&nbsp;
things get even better.

00:06:09.481 --> 00:06:12.040
Dare I say, mind-blowing.

00:06:12.040 --> 00:06:16.209
Remember that we can pipe&nbsp;
natural gas into a building and burn it there,

00:06:16.209 --> 00:06:17.966
as we’ve been doing for decades,

00:06:17.966 --> 00:06:22.424
and we&nbsp;can capture perhaps 95% of its energy as heat.

00:06:22.424 --> 00:06:27.017
But if instead of doing that we burned&nbsp;
it in a power plant to make electricity,

00:06:27.017 --> 00:06:29.460
heat pumps will work their magic.

00:06:29.460 --> 00:06:33.651
We may only get&nbsp;40% of the gas’s energy turned into electricity,

00:06:33.651 --> 00:06:38.300
but when you use it to run a heat pump operating&nbsp;
with a COP of 5,

00:06:38.300 --> 00:06:43.386
in the end you’re effectively operating at 200% efficiency.

00:06:43.386 --> 00:06:50.837
That’s a 100% bonus&nbsp;compared to burning the gas in a furnace or boiler with perfect efficiency.

00:06:50.837 --> 00:06:57.981
Literally more&nbsp;energy than the gas itself contains ends up getting put into buildings when you use it&nbsp;this way,

00:06:57.981 --> 00:06:59.845
and that’s nothing short of amazing!

00:07:00.480 --> 00:07:04.320
Of course, as I’m sure certain curmudgeons&nbsp;
are shouting loudly at their screens,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:05.079 --> 00:07:09.018
I need to tell you that heat pumps don’t always work that well.

00:07:09.018 --> 00:07:16.638
But,&nbsp;they only need to operate with a COP of 2.5 to break even with on-site fuel combustion.

00:07:16.638 --> 00:07:20.546
That&nbsp;turns the 40% captured in a natural gas power plant

00:07:20.800 --> 00:07:25.680
right back into 100% - eking out&nbsp;even the most efficient furnaces.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:26.400 --> 00:07:28.908
And, here’s why this video’s happening,

00:07:28.908 --> 00:07:32.757
that&nbsp;is actually very, very attainable.

00:07:33.250 --> 00:07:34.009
Today.

00:07:34.240 --> 00:07:36.853
With simple air source heat pumps.

00:07:36.853 --> 00:07:39.448
Even in&nbsp;cold climates.

00:07:39.448 --> 00:07:44.277
Various manufacturers are now producing ductless cold-climate mini-split heat&nbsp;pumps

00:07:44.277 --> 00:07:49.691
that manage that COP or better down to -15 degrees Celsius,

00:07:49.691 --> 00:07:51.820
or 5 Fahrenheit.

00:07:51.820 --> 00:07:55.926
They’re&nbsp;also able to maintain their full rated output at that temperature,

00:07:55.926 --> 00:07:58.800
though with reduced&nbsp;efficiency compared to milder weather.

00:07:59.600 --> 00:08:04.720
For the purposes of this video I’m only&nbsp;
focusing on published data for certain models,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08:04.720 --> 00:08:09.600
and I will freely admit that these models&nbsp;
are state-of-the-art and, for the moment,

00:08:09.600 --> 00:08:11.673
exceptionally efficient.

00:08:11.673 --> 00:08:16.516
But it’s important&nbsp;to remember that these are machines for sale right now,

00:08:16.516 --> 00:08:19.125
not some theoretical future devices.

00:08:19.125 --> 00:08:23.151
And they are no more disruptive to install than an air conditioner.

00:08:23.151 --> 00:08:26.801
The technology is here. Now.&nbsp;We know how to build it,

00:08:26.801 --> 00:08:31.064
and if we had any sense we’d start doing that as fast as we can.

00:08:31.628 --> 00:08:33.040
But&nbsp;I’m getting a little bit ahead of myself.

00:08:33.760 --> 00:08:39.840
I live in the Chicago area, and we love to tell&nbsp;
you just how brutally cold our winters can get.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08:39.840 --> 00:08:43.774
And yes, I know there are places that get colder&nbsp;than here.

00:08:43.774 --> 00:08:45.371
Much colder.

00:08:45.371 --> 00:08:51.629
But we are definitely one of those places where the conventional&nbsp;wisdom says heat pumps don’t work.

00:08:51.629 --> 00:08:57.509
Many, many people think it’s just too cold here to&nbsp;
bother installing a heat pump,

00:08:57.509 --> 00:09:00.197
and so that pretty much never happens.

00:09:00.197 --> 00:09:03.713
It does get quite cold for some&nbsp;stretch of every winter -

00:09:03.713 --> 00:09:13.040
a few years ago we had a 48 hour period where the actual air temperature&nbsp;didn’t get above -10° F, which is about -23° C.

00:09:13.600 --> 00:09:18.000
For much of that time, it was warmer&nbsp;
in your freezer than it was outside!

00:09:18.640 --> 00:09:23.596
But, and very importantly, that’s far from ordinary.

00:09:23.596 --> 00:09:27.777
It&nbsp;sticks out in our minds because it hurts to go outside on those days,

00:09:27.777 --> 00:09:32.923
but if we actually look at&nbsp;historical data for the winter of 2018 into 2019,

00:09:32.923 --> 00:09:34.354
here’s what we find.

00:09:34.354 --> 00:09:38.873
In the month of November,&nbsp;we didn’t get anywhere close to 5° Fahrenheit.

00:09:38.873 --> 00:09:44.181
And remember, it needs to be colder than that for&nbsp;
a furnace to beat a good heat pump.

00:09:44.181 --> 00:09:47.202
In December, the closest we got was 16°.

00:09:48.236 --> 00:09:50.226
In January... things&nbsp;got worse,

00:09:50.226 --> 00:09:53.292
we spent 2 nights below 5 ° in the third week,

00:09:53.292 --> 00:09:58.079
and then that lovely polar vortex&nbsp;hit and things got particularly rough.

00:09:58.079 --> 00:10:03.239
Almost the entire last week of January had evenings&nbsp;
below 5 degrees, and then…

00:10:03.757 --> 00:10:06.000
well… this wasn’t fun.

00:10:06.800 --> 00:10:10.565
But actually? That was… kinda it.

00:10:10.565 --> 00:10:14.067
Only three days&nbsp;in February, the 1st, 8th, and 9th,

00:10:14.067 --> 00:10:16.405
landed at or below 5 degrees.

00:10:16.405 --> 00:10:20.041
In March we had two more days at&nbsp;
the start that dipped below 5,

00:10:20.041 --> 00:10:23.953
but then by April we’re essentially out of the woods of Winter so, yeah,

00:10:23.953 --> 00:10:26.080
nothing close to that cold was experienced.

00:10:26.800 --> 00:10:29.600
So, for the entire winter season that year,

00:10:29.600 --> 00:10:34.451
there&nbsp;were only 14 days where a conventional furnace would have outperformed a heat pump -

00:10:34.451 --> 00:10:38.942
when it&nbsp;comes to the amount of fuel needed to produce the same amount of heat.

00:10:38.942 --> 00:10:44.317
And for most of those&nbsp;days, it still got above 5 degrees during at least part of the day.

00:10:44.317 --> 00:10:48.000
In fact there were only two&nbsp;days the entire year where that didn’t happen.

00:10:48.560 --> 00:10:52.560
Three if you count the 25th of January&nbsp;
where we just barely hit 5.

00:10:53.200 --> 00:10:54.937
Actually, why stop there?

00:10:54.937 --> 00:10:59.840
We’ve got hourly data,&nbsp;too, how many hours were we below 5 that year?

00:11:00.400 --> 00:11:05.725
By my count it was 141 hours, or not quite 6&nbsp;entire days.

00:11:05.725 --> 00:11:11.070
So, there were only 6 days of the entire winter season in which,

00:11:11.070 --> 00:11:14.816
when it comes&nbsp;to the amount of energy natural gas contains,

00:11:14.816 --> 00:11:21.154
a furnace made more sense than a heat pump running&nbsp;
on electricity produced with that natural gas.

00:11:21.154 --> 00:11:22.101
That’s…

00:11:22.560 --> 00:11:24.194
astounding!

00:11:24.194 --> 00:11:31.772
Are we willing to say that heat&nbsp;pumps don’t work in Chicago because for six days of the winter we’d have been better off&nbsp;with a furnace?

00:11:31.772 --> 00:11:33.946
Well I hope not because that’s ludicrous.

00:11:33.946 --> 00:11:35.322
You’d literally be saying

00:11:35.322 --> 00:11:42.021
“Well, we&nbsp;shouldn’t with this technology which can reduce our use of energy for 144 days of the&nbsp;five-month heating season

00:11:42.021 --> 00:11:45.087
because SOMETIMES it can’t do that.”

00:11:45.087 --> 00:11:47.073
Listen to that. It’s ridiculous!

00:11:47.073 --> 00:11:48.210
“But sometimes…”

00:11:48.210 --> 00:11:53.136
Yeah, sometimes life is hard, and new solutions bring new challenges.

00:11:53.136 --> 00:11:55.002
But let’s keep it big picture, alright?

00:11:55.440 --> 00:11:57.650
Let’s look at some other years, too.

00:11:57.650 --> 00:12:01.924
I’m just&nbsp;gonna look at days, though, finding the total hours is a bit of a pain.

00:12:01.924 --> 00:12:07.417
The previous winter had&nbsp;13 days where the temperature dipped below 5 at some point.

00:12:07.417 --> 00:12:09.794
The year before that had only 9.

00:12:09.794 --> 00:12:13.275
And 2015 into 2016&nbsp;had only 8.

00:12:13.275 --> 00:12:17.605
Jumping forward, 2019 into 2020 had but 2,

00:12:17.605 --> 00:12:20.409
though some days did just hit 5 degrees.

00:12:20.409 --> 00:12:26.926
2020 into 2021 experienced 8 days with a low below 5 degrees, 
all in February incidentally.

00:12:26.926 --> 00:12:31.371
And the&nbsp;winter we’re just clawing our way out of now had only 5 days.

00:12:31.371 --> 00:12:34.522
Though, it’s not impossible&nbsp;
for there to be another one before May rolls around.

00:12:35.120 --> 00:12:37.665
Now, it’s important to note&nbsp;a couple of things.

00:12:37.665 --> 00:12:43.563
First, I’m not talking about the monetary cost of&nbsp;
delivered energy here.

00:12:43.563 --> 00:12:49.280
I do need to make that clear - the cost of electricity in&nbsp;
your area compared to that of natural gas&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:12:49.280 --> 00:12:53.100
makes cost comparisons a hyper-local exercise.

00:12:53.100 --> 00:12:56.926
Although, recent volatility sure makes this a fluid situation,

00:12:56.926 --> 00:13:00.820
and suggests that maybe&nbsp;
we ought to diversify our energy portfolios,

00:13:00.820 --> 00:13:04.739
which the electric grid is particularly suited&nbsp;
to do by the way, in case you hadn’t noticed.

00:13:05.360 --> 00:13:08.543
But this is a wrinkle to heat pump adoption

00:13:08.543 --> 00:13:11.299
that we should probably figure a way around.

00:13:11.840 --> 00:13:16.079
If it’s more expensive to use the option&nbsp;that saves energy...

00:13:16.643 --> 00:13:17.844
that’s a problem.

00:13:18.240 --> 00:13:21.749
And second, I do need to acknowledge that&nbsp;those periods of time

00:13:21.749 --> 00:13:29.040
where heat pumps can’t get to natural gas parity are&nbsp;
also when heating demand is greatest.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:13:29.040 --> 00:13:39.262
So while I can say that there were only 141 hours&nbsp;
in which a furnace would have used fewer resources&nbsp;than a state-of-the-art air-source heat pump in the 2018-2019&nbsp;Chicago winter season

00:13:39.262 --> 00:13:40.065
[inhales]

00:13:40.277 --> 00:13:42.170
that’s incomplete.

00:13:42.170 --> 00:13:48.593
We’d need to normalize things by weighting that&nbsp;
time more heavily if we want to get a more complete answer.

00:13:48.593 --> 00:13:52.000
But I’m not gonna do that for&nbsp;
you because I do not possess the expertise.

00:13:52.640 --> 00:13:55.920
However, it is factually the case that right now,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:13:55.920 --> 00:13:58.415
today, BTU for BTU,

00:13:58.415 --> 00:13:59.575
therm for therm,

00:13:59.575 --> 00:14:01.239
cubic meter&nbsp;for cubic meter,

00:14:01.239 --> 00:14:03.582
kilowatt-hour for kilowatt-hour,

00:14:03.582 --> 00:14:08.351
we can heat more homes and businesses by burning&nbsp;
gas in power plants

00:14:08.351 --> 00:14:12.000
and using that energy to run simple air-source heat pumps

00:14:12.000 --> 00:14:19.093
than we can by piping&nbsp;that gas to those places and burning it locally for the vast majority of the winter.

00:14:19.093 --> 00:14:26.213
So long as&nbsp;we are going to use natural gas, that is full stop the smarter way to use it most of the time.

00:14:26.213 --> 00:14:29.346
And&nbsp;most of the time is what actually matters, folks.

00:14:29.680 --> 00:14:32.498
There are also some other marginal benefits&nbsp;to this.

00:14:32.498 --> 00:14:35.295
In places that have district heating infrastructure,

00:14:35.295 --> 00:14:38.720
the waste heat from those power&nbsp;
plants could be used to heat buildings nearby.

00:14:39.680 --> 00:14:43.934
We have very little of that in the US so, ya&nbsp;know...

00:14:43.934 --> 00:14:48.296
yay, but methane itself is a really potent greenhouse gas

00:14:48.296 --> 00:14:51.552
and leaks in the infrastructure&nbsp;are problematic.

00:14:51.552 --> 00:14:56.147
The fact that we have pipes filled with it everywhere around here

00:14:56.147 --> 00:15:01.239
and there&nbsp;are countless fittings, junctions, valves, 
pumping stations, and who knows what else

00:15:01.239 --> 00:15:04.082
means&nbsp;we have a lot of potential for leaks.

00:15:04.082 --> 00:15:07.402
Eliminating that infrastructure, or at least reducing its use,

00:15:07.402 --> 00:15:09.840
can reduce those impacts of natural gas as well.

00:15:10.720 --> 00:15:14.010
Of course, and for the long-term most importantly,

00:15:14.010 --> 00:15:17.864
being electric, a heat pump is energy agnostic.

00:15:17.864 --> 00:15:20.555
It doesn’t have to be powered by natural gas,

00:15:20.555 --> 00:15:24.290
it&nbsp;can be powered by the sun, by the wind, or by the atom.

00:15:24.290 --> 00:15:29.805
And since they use any of those resources&nbsp;
much more efficiently than resistive heating does,

00:15:29.805 --> 00:15:35.175
they allow us to electrify many more homes&nbsp;
and businesses with today’s grid output,

00:15:35.175 --> 00:15:40.404
and reduce the need for the grid to grow as&nbsp;
more and more places ditch gas altogether.

00:15:40.960 --> 00:15:46.160
Heat pumps are incredibly important not just&nbsp;
for their immediate ability to curb gas use,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:15:46.720 --> 00:15:49.115
but for their long-term sustainability.

00:15:49.600 --> 00:15:53.548
Now, I do want to answer a question I’m sure many&nbsp;
of you are asking:

00:15:53.548 --> 00:15:57.208
what happens on those *really* cold days?

00:15:57.208 --> 00:15:58.705
Well, that depends.

00:15:58.705 --> 00:16:04.983
Many units now&nbsp;guarantee operation down to -13°F which is -25°C,

00:16:05.200 --> 00:16:10.530
but they won’t attain their full output and will&nbsp;
have a poor COP at that temp.

00:16:10.530 --> 00:16:15.795
Still generally better than 1, though, so it still makes sense&nbsp;
to run over resistive heat.

00:16:15.795 --> 00:16:18.630
If that’s about the coldest temperature you ever experience,

00:16:18.630 --> 00:16:23.476
you may&nbsp;not need a backup at all assuming your home is insulated well enough.

00:16:23.476 --> 00:16:27.689
But, having some sort of&nbsp;backup may be required depending on where you are.

00:16:28.000 --> 00:16:33.760
If you have a centrally ducted system this can be&nbsp;
auxiliary, high-powered electric heating elements&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:16:33.760 --> 00:16:37.524
often known as heat strips which are placed in&nbsp;
the air handler.

00:16:37.524 --> 00:16:42.097
Or you could be pairing a heat pump up with a gas furnace if you so desire.

00:16:42.097 --> 00:16:45.329
The&nbsp;backup can be as simple as a few space heaters,

00:16:45.329 --> 00:16:48.382
which might be ideal if you’ve chosen a ductless&nbsp;system,

00:16:48.382 --> 00:16:53.258
although they’re not very efficient and can be dangerous if not properly used.

00:16:53.258 --> 00:17:00.216
It should&nbsp;also be noted that simply bundling up and choosing to tolerate cooler indoor temperatures&nbsp;during those periods is also an option.

00:17:00.640 --> 00:17:03.243
The thing to keep in mind about these&nbsp;
backups, though,

00:17:03.243 --> 00:17:07.004
is that they are needed only in exceptional cases.

00:17:07.004 --> 00:17:12.600
And because&nbsp;modern heat pumps will operate down to -25°C, or -13°F

00:17:12.880 --> 00:17:15.468
those cases can be quite rare.

00:17:15.468 --> 00:17:18.696
Going&nbsp;back to that 2018-2019 winter season,

00:17:18.696 --> 00:17:23.611
here around Chicago we were below&nbsp;that temperature for about 32 hours total,

00:17:23.611 --> 00:17:26.538
all consecutive during that polar vortex&nbsp;event.

00:17:26.538 --> 00:17:29.040
This past winter, it never got that cold.

00:17:29.920 --> 00:17:34.496
Again, I know we’re talking about what are today&nbsp;
exceptionally good heat pumps.

00:17:34.990 --> 00:17:37.695
Plenty are on the market that don’t perform that well,

00:17:37.695 --> 00:17:41.352
and won’t perform&nbsp;at all at those cold temps.

00:17:41.352 --> 00:17:46.635
But there are tons of places with much milder heating needs than here,

00:17:46.635 --> 00:17:51.220
and in those places the more average-performing models will be great fits.

00:17:51.220 --> 00:17:54.399
That’s why they’re&nbsp;pretty common already in the southern US.

00:17:54.560 --> 00:17:59.029
And let’s not forget - we’re probably only&nbsp;
going to get better at building heat pumps

00:17:59.029 --> 00:18:00.626
as time goes on.

00:18:00.626 --> 00:18:03.046
In fact, of that I am certain.

00:18:03.046 --> 00:18:09.867
I’ll be surprised if in 10 years from now, a COP of 2.5 isn’t maintained down to truly arctic&nbsp;temps.

00:18:10.666 --> 00:18:18.220
And also, I do just want to note that every home I’ve lived in so far has had a single point&nbsp;of failure when it comes to the heating system.

00:18:18.220 --> 00:18:23.280
When the furnace has stopped working, which it&nbsp;
has, the space heaters come out until it’s fixed.

00:18:24.240 --> 00:18:28.475
Maybe don’t fixate on the whole backup&nbsp;situation
all that much, is what I’m saying.

00:18:29.120 --> 00:18:32.960
OK, so I hope we’re in agreement&nbsp;that heat pumps are amazing devices&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:18:32.960 --> 00:18:38.400
and reduce our need for literally any source of&nbsp;
energy in all but the most extreme temperatures.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:18:39.040 --> 00:18:44.080
And to reiterate, that not only means we can&nbsp;
burn less gas as we transition away from it,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:18:44.080 --> 00:18:49.710
but also means we need fewer wind turbines, solar&nbsp;farms, 
nuclear plants, batteries, hydro storage&nbsp;facilities...

00:18:50.148 --> 00:18:55.576
literally whatever because reducing&nbsp;the amount of energy we need to heat buildings

00:18:55.576 --> 00:19:03.599
reduces the need for all those things and so&nbsp;
makes transitioning to an all-electric future much, much easier.

00:19:03.599 --> 00:19:05.587
I say again,&nbsp;with vigor;

00:19:05.587 --> 00:19:07.152
More pumping.

00:19:07.152 --> 00:19:08.136
More now.

00:19:08.720 --> 00:19:11.657
But what does that future look like?

00:19:11.657 --> 00:19:14.240
Well, that is in many ways up to you.

00:19:15.040 --> 00:19:19.561
Air-source heat pumps are really just slightly&nbsp;
refined air conditioners,

00:19:19.561 --> 00:19:23.610
and they come in all sorts of shapes, sizes, and applications -

00:19:23.610 --> 00:19:26.182
some of which are really exciting!

00:19:26.182 --> 00:19:29.896
However, we also have many challenges we need to overcome—

00:19:29.896 --> 00:19:32.830
some real, and some artificial.

00:19:32.830 --> 00:19:35.800
But this video’s gone on pretty long as it is.

00:19:35.800 --> 00:19:40.963
I hope you&nbsp;enjoyed this new part 2? Part 2.5? of my heat pump series,

00:19:40.963 --> 00:19:45.195
and in part three we’ll talk about what it&nbsp;
takes to install a heat pump -

00:19:45.195 --> 00:19:50.386
both literally, as in, like, what the parts are, where&nbsp;
they go, and how they connect together.

00:19:50.386 --> 00:19:56.631
And a look at why the process can be so&nbsp;hard - 
and what we need to do to fix that.

00:19:57.594 --> 00:20:00.168
♫ importantly smooth jazz ♫

00:20:01.555 --> 00:20:02.852
and air conditioners,

00:20:02.852 --> 00:20:06.523
and we're finally starting to collectively realize...

00:20:06.523 --> 00:20:08.254
hoo I'm out of breath!

00:20:08.254 --> 00:20:10.501
So... what's this one for.

00:20:10.501 --> 00:20:14.742
Well, heat pumps are at the t.... [haughhghhg noises]

00:20:14.742 --> 00:20:18.274
Largely because I ignored the developments that are already...

00:20:18.274 --> 00:20:20.507
whoops. That have happened!

00:20:20.507 --> 00:20:21.786
[inhales].

00:20:21.974 --> 00:20:22.500
Hi.

00:20:23.628 --> 00:20:24.128
Hi.

00:20:27.710 --> 00:20:28.836
Hang on a second.

00:20:29.706 --> 00:20:32.081
My eyes are playing tricks on me.

00:20:32.081 --> 00:20:33.687
Which is this one. Right now.

00:20:33.687 --> 00:20:36.594
It actuallya mae....

00:20:37.534 --> 00:20:40.339
I'm not gonna do that for you because I don't porsess...

00:20:40.339 --> 00:20:41.592
Oh crud.

00:20:41.592 --> 00:20:45.498
Porsess? I don't porsess the exportise?

00:20:47.097 --> 00:20:49.296
So, more pumping more now, amirite?

00:20:49.296 --> 00:20:54.837
Seriously, this is probably the single most impactful thing we could be doing in the immediate future for *so* many reasons and in *so* many ways.

00:20:54.837 --> 00:21:00.636
Manufacturers need to get cranking, and as we'll see in Part 3... American manufacturers in particular need to learn how to make a decent heat pump.

00:21:00.636 --> 00:21:02.255
They're really... quite mediocre at the moment.

